Ruling the Roost – Photomatix Pro 4   2 comments


A peacock sits in an oak tree at the Joseph Jefferson mansion, New Iberia, Louisiana

I finally had a chance to open up the new Photomatix Pro 4 program, currently in public beta.  I had been looking forward to checking out some of the new features, particularly the anti-ghosting capabilities.

Some people have had mixed results with the anti-ghosting feature, but in the case of this bracket set it seemed to work very well.  I knew that the peacock had moved his head while I was shooting the bracket — which previously prevented me from bothering to process it — so I figured it would be a good test of the new Photomatix.

During processing, Photomatix Pro 4 allows you to draw a boundary around an area that is ghosted. From there, you can select Preview to see how Photomatix will handle the ghosting by pulling information from a single exposure.  If that doesn’t work out well, you have the choice of selecting another exposure, which I did in this case by choosing the -2EV frame.  Once this is done, you can proceed along in the usual fashion.

Just for grins, I ran the same bracket through the program without choosing the anti-ghosting features, which I assume is using much the same algorithm that Photomatix Pro 3 used.  The result of that pass was this:

While this was just my first pass with the program, things look pretty good.  There are other new features that I’ll talk about in future blog posts, so please do stay tuned.

Advertisements

2 responses to “Ruling the Roost – Photomatix Pro 4

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Thanks for mention the upgraded ghosting feature. I was trying to figure out what changed 😀
    My opinion is a little more harsh with 4. Have you ran the same exposure through the old version with the ghosting feature on? Would like to see the results from that.

  2. Kim —

    Mind you, these results are just preliminary. I have yet to really give Photomatix Pro 4 a good going over.

    I’ll run the same set through Photomatix 3, but I imagine the results will be the same as in the second photograph. As I mentioned in the post, I think it’s pretty much the same algorithm being used.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: